In the United States, lawsuits filed in the interest of estate beneficiaries sometimes called “derivative actions,” address mismanagement of shareholder assets tied to a family-owned business. Although the standard protocol for executor or trustee administration of estate concerns is guided by federal and state rules of estate in line with the directives of the estate owner’s will and beneficiaries involved, miscommunicated fiduciary transfers where shareholders are generally considered a serious violation. Misconduct may also be result of third-party decision related to investment transfer of an estate or trust assets. When an estate or trust family-owned corporation has been violated as result of improper fiduciary conduct, a derivative action can be filed on behalf of its beneficiaries. Estate planners and planned giving specialists involved in the trust management of a family-owned corporate assets as part of nonprofit charitable giving strategy, will want to read on to find out more about the implications of individual share transfers and the risks associated with derivative action lawsuits.
Estate or trust control of a family-owned corporation is a form of “ownership.” A family-owned corporation that is part of an estate or trust is a valuable shareholder asset. Derivative actions by a plaintiff citing claim of fiduciary breach in transactional relationship with the share interests of an estate held family-owned business, are reviewed for adherence to federal tort rules by the court. In most states, derivative actions must also be satisfied with a plaintiff’s ability to meet demand requirements. Those requirements are consistent with the “negligence calculus” described in tort law, stipulating a plaintiff prove there is misconduct by a defendant leading to material breach or detriment.
Derivative actions are subject to the evidentiary rule of “demand futility” in court. This principle is often cited to be the reason beneficiaries seeking timely transfer of estate or trust family-owned business shareholder assets suffer losses in the face of what are seemingly unscrupulous conduct by an executor, trustee, or third party. Not surprisingly, family-owned corporation interests can complicate execution of an estate or trust if it goes to probat
When the rule of “demand futility” is enforced by a court in an estate law matter, it signals a claim against a party who has allegedly making an independent and disinterested business judgment of detriment to the other shareholders is inadequate on basis of the plaintiff’s lack of evidence. Exceptions to demand futility requirements in estate law disputes, are generally affirmed if there is basis to allegations an executor or trustee has not properly exercised independent and disinterested judgment in investment decisions, beneficiary distributions, or other administrative action.
Disputes demanding court review of a corporation and its assets involving an estate or trust, are subject to review of the administrator of those actions. Moreover, a derivative action regarding an estate held corporation that will cause dissolution of the interests of its shareholders and other detriment, regardless of dispute over the “independent and disinterested business judgment” of a defendant, may be subject to dismissal on grounds of insufficient evidence.
Estate Planning content and filler articles for your newsletters.
Derivative actions” are complex yet not always successful legal matters, that attempt to address mismanagement of shareholder assets tied to a family-owned business owned by a trust.
This is the definitive resource for professional gift planners. It covers all of the relevant information you’ll ever need as far as technical details go.